I've been teaching since 1996, asking me to pick one awful professional development is hardly fair. As I started thinking about this topic, I realized I could easily create a blog just on terrible, waste of time, hardly worth getting out of bed...professional developments.
Generally speaking I am pretty certain that I can safely put them into 2 categories of inside the district and outside the district. It seems that most of the PD's I've been to that are done by "professional development companies" are fairly well organized and acquire presenters that are well versed in their areas. Now, it so happens that with these professional developments you obviously have no opportunity for follow-up or extension. The follow-up portion or extension of knowledge is the part that I feel the district done professional developments really have the opportunity to hit a "home run" in. Unfortunately, they normally either strike out or go for the bunt. (done with baseball metaphors now)
I used to teach in a district in Kansas ( a rural area). To kick off every new school year the district would put together a PD smorgasbord. That's what they would call it. In theory it sounds great. If you had been teaching in the district for more than a year you knew it was a wasted day. There were 5 schools in the district and we would all show up at the high school. All of the pd's were done by one of the districts' teachers. Bad call #1. They were lazy, they already new their audience, and if they taught one of the classes then they didn't have to attend any of the other sessions....I believe they also got free bagels for the day.
Anyway, I remember going to this Spanish session for 45 minutes. The summary listed the class as a Spanish 1 course for teachers who wanted to communicate more effectively with the Spanish speaking students and their families. The first 10 minutes were taken by the presenter (district spanish teacher) discussing the upcoming football practice with the coach who came in to take the class. The rest of the time we practiced greetings and numbers and to wrap it up he taught us a song about a flower, or at least he told us it was about a flower. Frankly, at that point I had my doubts as to if I was really singing about a flower....this guy had a strange sense of funny. Anyway, I left and shook my head and thought, "I can't believe that guy is getting free bagels for the rest of the day."
Below are the 3 points listed as to what constitutes as an effective staff development by the National Staff Development Council Standards for Staff Development.
- has small groups of educators working together over time in professional learning communities;
- is based on principles of effective adult learning; and
- deepens educators’ content knowledge.
- We did not work together over a period of time. It was 45 minutes and then never again. Since it was within the district it would have been a perfect opportunity to get together on a weekly basis to truly work toward the goal of more effective communication.
- I am not sure this PD was based on ANY principles to tell you the truth.
- Deepened my content knowledge: I can now sing a song in Spanish about what I believe to be a flower, although because I'm not completely convinced, I'm unwilling to take the chance.
One day while talking to my vet, she explained that when vets gathered, they talked about animal horror stories. She would always save a story about one of my dogs, and after she told it, they stopped telling the stories because it couldn't be topped. If we gathered at told horror stories about bad pd, your story could have ended the discussion. The described activities missed every possible good pd characteristic. It is good to know that Chicago has not cornered the market of bad professional development. Oh yeah, will you sing the song at the next class?
ReplyDeleteI have attended many AWFUL PDs but only you can put a spin on the situation and make it sound so hilarious! I too, would like to hear the song you learned about the flower or whatever. Did you have the opportunity to write an evaluation of the PD other than this one?
ReplyDeleteWill you sing the "flower" song for the class?
ReplyDeleteWell Anna I think that you have definitely proved to us what an awful PD looks like. I do think, based off this experience, you know exactly what NOT to do!!!
ReplyDeleteBagels and a Spanish song, WOW!! I hate that they didn't share any bagels with the participants and only the facilitators, how dare them. I agree this is a funny story. I believe that if a facilitator/training has not give the goals and objectives of the P.D. in the first 3-5 minutes, it may be down hill, and if most of the conversation is geared towards, themselves and how great they think they are or a totally different topic, then, rich and informative content may never show up.
ReplyDelete